No hay artículos en el carro
No hay artículos en el carro
Procesador: procesador AMD Ryzen 7 8745H, 8 núcleos/16 hilos (caché de 16 m, hasta 4,9 GHz).
GPU: AMD Radeon 780M.
Memoria: DDR5 de doble canal (ranuras SODIMM × 2, hasta 4800 MHz).
Almacenamiento: compatible con 2 SSD M.2 2280 PCIe4.0
Conectividad inalámbrica: soporte WiFi M.2 2230 (Wi-Fi 6E, BlueTooth 5.3).
Salida de video: HDMI2.1 × 1; DP1.4 × 1; USB4 × 1.
Salida de audio: 1 HDMI; 1 DP y 1 conector de audio.
Interfaz periférica: puerto Ethernet RJ45 2.5G × 1USB3.2 Gen2 puerto tipo A × 2USB2.0 × 2USB4 × 1 (Alt PD) HDMI × 1DP × 1 conector de audio. × 1 CMOS transparente.
Potencia: CC 19 V (adaptador incluido).
Felix
Comentado en los Estados Unidos el 29 de marzo de 2025
Very powerful and affordable. I don't like the plastic clips when holding the lid because of brittleness, but I can't knock a star down at this price point.I even tested the iGPU with Final Fantasy VII Rebirth on lowest settings 720p in conjunction with the Lossless Scaling app on steam using upscaling to 1080p and frame generation and it was quite playable.I gave this to my mom as her new daily driver to replace her Dell Optiplex 9010 Micro, and it runs very silent when web browsing, doing spreadsheets, streaming video, and other basic productivity tasks.
Ancient Hibernian
Comentado en Canadá el 25 de marzo de 2025
A pleasingly fast computer – so much so that I bought a second one. Easy installation of memory and NVME SSD. CMOS battery conveniently located – for eventual replacement. Excellent internal sound components. Advertised “on-board” Wi-Fi is finicky; problem solved with a $19 “thumb” AC1300 – so no biggie.
EA
Comentado en los Estados Unidos el 3 de febrero de 2025
I have both 870 Slim and 890 Pro versions, they are both very fast and quiet with some minor issues.The main differences that makes the Pro version slightly better are (1) It is slightly faster, maybe 3% or so (2) has an NPU, but it is practically useless (3) Pro version has two ethernet ports instead of one (4) It has an oculink port, which uses the PCI port so, you can only install one NVme HD if you use the oculink port. These differences do not matter for most users.Overall I am very happy with both of them. They are both small, efficient, they don't get hot or make any fan noise. They can be directly powered from USB4 port, with some decrease in max clock speed.But there are some annoying issues, mostly minor things: (1) The wifi cards are not supported properly. The slim version had a wifi card which was not recognized by linux. The pro version had a slightly better wifi card, but was still an obscure brand. The issue is not the speed here, making them recognized by the OS. I replaced them both with more common models, it is about $20-30 to replace each. (2) The windows key was invalid in the Pro version. The Slim version was barebones it did not come with any OS. (3) The Slim version has screws at a very inconvenient location. You have to remove bottom pads glued to the box. Without the pads the vent will touch the surface and will not work well. It is not a good design. The Pro version is much better, but it has two cables attached to the lid on opposite sides, and it is not east to detach and attach them. If they were on the same side, the lid could be opened without detaching of them. (4) I tried installing 96GB RAM but it caused some glitch with the GPU driver. I tested the RAM and it was not faulty. 64GB or 32 GB RAM both work fine. (5) I don't like the bios, it is too rudimentary with very few options.Despite these issues, I like them a lot. This generation of AMD mobile chips (8945, 8745, etc) are really great. I also have a Mac mini pro (M2) and their performances are similar. Mac has a better GPU but the AMD is faster for most of other tasks.
X
Comentado en los Estados Unidos el 15 de febrero de 2025
Broken computer was sent, fps was constantly falling to 25 in games
Productos recomendados